199k views
2 votes
Olumbia v. Heller (2008), the Court

A. determined that the Second Amendment is irrelevant in modern times.
B. struck down a law prohibiting the registration and possession of firearms.
C. limited the use of weapons to the federal military, standing armies, and local police.
D. allowed businesses to sell particularly deadly weapons, such as sawed-off shotguns, to individuals.

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

In Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court struck down a law prohibiting the registration and possession of firearms, affirming the individual's right to possess a firearm for self-defense.


Step-by-step explanation:

In Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court struck down a law prohibiting the registration and possession of firearms. The Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for self-defense, which includes handguns commonly used for that purpose. This landmark decision affirmed that the Second Amendment applies to all law-abiding citizens and is not limited to the use of weapons in the military or by law enforcement.


Learn more about Second Amendment

User Mahaveer Muttha
by
7.7k points