Final answer:
A lawyer interested in understanding why a majority decision was used in a specific way in a Supreme Court case should consult a concurring opinion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correct answer is C. concurring opinion.
In the Supreme Court, a concurring opinion is a separate opinion written by a justice who agrees with the majority's decision but for different reasons. A concurring opinion can provide additional analysis and perspectives on the case, and it can be useful for lawyers who want to understand the reasoning behind the majority decision in a particular way. For example, a lawyer interested in understanding the implications of a Supreme Court case for future cases may find a concurring opinion helpful in deciphering the majority's reasoning and potential interpretations of the law.
Therefore, if a lawyer wants to understand why a majority decision was used in a specific way in a Supreme Court case, consulting a
concurring opinion would be the most appropriate choice.
Learn more about concurring opinion