Answer: The storming of the Bastille
Step-by-step explanation:
The Storming of the Bastille weakened the King's strength more than the Tennis Court Oath.
First, the Storming of the Bastille was a violent act that directly challenged the King's authority. It was a symbol of the people's uprising against the monarchy and their demand for change. The storming of this prison not only demonstrated the people's willingness to use force to oppose the King, but it also marked the beginning of the French Revolution.
On the other hand, the Tennis Court Oath was a peaceful protest by members of the Third Estate who wanted more political power. They gathered in a tennis court and pledged not to disband until they had established a new constitution. While this oath showed their determination, it did not directly threaten the King's authority in the same way as the storming of the Bastille.
Furthermore, the Storming of the Bastille had a more significant impact on public opinion and international perception. It demonstrated the deep-rooted dissatisfaction with the monarchy and sparked widespread support for the revolutionary cause. The violence and chaos associated with the storming of the Bastille also signaled to other European powers that the French monarchy was vulnerable and unstable.
In contrast, the Tennis Court Oath primarily affected the internal dynamics of the French political system. It was an important moment in the formation of the National Assembly and the push for political reforms, but it did not have the same external implications as the storming of the Bastille.
Overall, while both events challenged the King's authority, the Storming of the Bastille weakened his power more significantly due to its violent nature, the symbolic value it held for the people, and its broader impact on public opinion and international perception.