57.4k views
0 votes
"We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of 'separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational

facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have
been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the
Fourteenth Amendment....."
Describe the political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals through this
court case.
(1 point)
Social movements demonstrated in large groups.
Interest groups create political alliances with parties.
Congress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness.
Interest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme Court.

User Vokram
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The court case of Brown v. Board of Education used interest groups to challenge racial segregation in public schools.


Step-by-step explanation:

The court case mentioned in the question is Brown v. Board of Education, which addressed the issue of racial segregation in public schools. The political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals was interest groups litigating unfair laws in the Supreme Court. In this case, the plaintiffs argued that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal, which violated the equal protection guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment.


Learn more about Brown v. Board of Education