Final answer:
Shays's Rebellion was in fact, instrumental in exemplifying the issues with the Articles of Confederation and stimulated the drive for creating a more stable federal constitution. Hence, the assertion that the rebellion's failure lessened the need for a new constitution is incorrect.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Shays's Rebellion was such a failure that it lessened the sense of need for a new federal constitution is False. Shays's Rebellion was an uprising led by Daniel Shays due to economic difficulties and political discontent.
Despite the rebellion resulting in eighteen deaths and eventually being quelled by a privately-funded militia, its lasting effects were far-reaching. The rebellion intensified the fear of anarchy amongst the wealthy property holders and highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
This led key figures like George Washington and Alexander Hamilton to advocate for a stronger federal system. The failure of the rebellion actually highlighted the need for a new federal constitution that could provide greater stability.
Learn more about Shays's Rebellion