Question

Question 3 of 10

What was the effect of the United States' involvement in the Rwandan
genocide of the mid-1990s?
O A. Members of the Hutu ethnic group agreed to end their violence
against the Tutsi people.
O
B. There was no effect because the United States wasn't involved in
the Rwandan genocide.
C. Those responsible were brought to justice, but violence continued
for many years after.
D. A democratic government that represented all Rwandans was
established.
SUBMIT

Answer 1

The United States was not involved in the Rwandan genocide; thus, their involvement had no effect on the conflict. The genocide concluded with the rise of Tutsi rebels defeating the Hutu militias.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer to the question 'What was the effect of the United States' involvement in the Rwandan genocide of the mid-1990s?' is B. There was no effect because the United States wasn't involved in the Rwandan genocide. During the Rwandan genocide, the U.S., burned from a previous military intervention in Somalia, opted not to intervene directly in the conflict. This decision followed the tragic killing of ten UN peacekeepers, leading to the U.S. advocating for the withdrawal of UN forces. The genocide eventually ended when Tutsi rebels gained strength and defeated the Hutu militias, prompting a huge number of Hutu to become refugees.

Answer 2

The United States had a negligible effect on the Rwandan Genocide as it chose not to intervene, influenced by a lack of strategic interests and the desire to avoid another failed military engagement similar to Somalia. The crisis was ultimately addressed by African nations and the Tutsi minority's forces, with the U.S. later acknowledging the mistake of inaction.

Step-by-step explanation:

The effect of the United States' involvement in the Rwandan Genocide was negligible because the United States was not actively involved in addressing the atrocities during the genocide. Despite the mass killings and ethnic cleansing that characterized this tragic period in the mid-1990s, the U.S. refrained from intervening, primarily due to the lack of strategic interests in Rwanda and the recent failure in Somalia. The Clinton administration's decision was influenced by the desire to avoid another debacle like the one in Somalia, which had led to American casualties and public outcry. As a result, the U.S. response to the Rwandan crisis was limited to calling for the withdrawal of UN peacekeepers after ten of them were killed, thus not contributing significantly to either the cessation of violence or the establishment of a new democratic government.

Following the genocide, area African nations and the Tutsi minority's forces intervened, eventually taking control of the Rwandan government. This led to large displacements and humanitarian crises with Hutu refugees fearing retribution, but no substantial contribution from the United States to halt the violence or foster immediate stability in Rwanda was made. It was only years after the genocide, during a visit to Rwanda in 1998, that President Clinton formally apologized for the United States' inaction.