203k views
4 votes
Beth enlarged the triangle below by a scale of 5. The original triangle had a base of 3.5 cm and a height of 4 cm. She found the area of the enlarged triangle using the formula (base)(height)(scale). However, she made an error in her calculation. What was Beth's error?

User Kvothe
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

She should have used this formula

0.5(base)(height)(scale)^2

where the 0.5(base)(height) portion is the area of the original triangle. Beth forgot about the 0.5 out front, aka 1/2. She also forgot to square the "scale" part.

Why do we square the "scale" part? Consider a triangle with base b and height h. Its area is 0.5bh

Now let's scale using the linear factor k. The base b turns into bk. The height turns into hk.

Then,

new area = 0.5*(new base)*(new height)

new area = 0.5*(bk)*(hk)

new area = 0.5bh*k^2

We have the k^2 at the end to signal we square the linear scale factor to get the area scale factor. This applies to any dilated shape. It doesn't have to be a triangle.

If 0 < k < 1, then the shape shrinks. If k > 1, then the shape enlarges.

User SachinSunny
by
7.0k points