Answer:
The diagram you mentioned is not provided in your message. However, I can provide you with some general information about scientific knowledge components.
According to the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), scientific knowledge is a collection of reliable new information about the physical world gathered through the process of data collection, experimentation, and analysis 1. Scientific knowledge has two components: Conceptual Understanding and Nature of Science. Conceptual understanding refers to the fundamental principles and concepts that underlie scientific knowledge. Nature of Science refers to the shared elements that characterize scientific inquiry, such as observations, rational argument, inference, skepticism, peer review, and reproducibility of work 2.
Regarding your question about which component is more powerful in explaining a scientific phenomenon, neither hypothesis nor theory can be based on possibility alone. Both are based on empirical evidence and are subject to testing and revision. However, a theory is more powerful than a hypothesis in explaining a scientific phenomenon because it is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on empirical evidence 1. A hypothesis is an educated guess or prediction that can be tested by experimentation or observation 2.
I hope this helps!
Step-by-step explanation: