Final answer:
The author claims that requiring handwriting instruction holds students back, and that typing is as effective as handwriting for learning to read, contrasting the view that handwriting has a moral purpose.
Step-by-step explanation:
A claim that the author makes in "handwriting just doesn’t matter" is that laws requiring the teaching of handwriting will only hold students back. The text suggests that prioritizing typing, which helps children learn to read just as well as writing does, over traditional handwriting may be more beneficial considering the technological advancements and demands of the modern world. Moreover, the text addresses the belief of some that handwriting has a moral purpose, but this view is contrasted with the argument that there is a lack of evidence supporting the idea that writing analysis reveals parts of people’s personalities.