Final answer:
The First Continental Congress pursued peaceful diplomacy and expressed grievances through the Declaration of Rights rather than declaring war against England. They encouraged a boycott to economically pressure Britain, and local committees were needed to enforce it. The Second Continental Congress established the Continental Army and took more direct action than the First Continental Congress.
Step-by-step explanation:
The other colonies cared about what happened at the First Continental Congress because the actions taken there would impact all the colonies. By sending a Declaration of Rights to King George III instead of declaring war against England, the Congress wanted to express their grievances and request fair treatment from the British government. They believed in peaceful diplomacy first before resorting to more extreme measures such as war.
A boycott was encouraged by the First Continental Congress as an effective action against Britain because it would hurt the British economy. By refusing to buy British goods, the colonies aimed to put economic pressure on the British government to address their concerns. Local committees were needed to enforce the boycott as they could monitor and ensure that people were not violating the boycott by purchasing British goods.
One way the work of the Second Continental Congress differed from that of the First Continental Congress was that the Second Continental Congress took more direct and decisive action by establishing the Continental Army and appointing George Washington as its commander-in-chief. The Second Continental Congress recognized the need for a unified military force to defend the colonies against British aggression.
Learn more about First and Second Continental Congress