Question

Identify the statement that provides a reason why manipulation of consumers is not relevant to marketing ethics: A. Knowing consumers' psychological profiles through marketing research, their motivations, interests, desires, beliefs, anxieties, and fears facilitates manipulation of their behavior. B. Some marketing practices target populations that are particularly susceptible to manipulation and deception C. One need not necessarily deceive a person in order to manipulate him or her. D. Manipulation doesn't necessarily entail total control over a person; it may simply be a process of subtle direction or management. All of the above. E. None of the above.

Answer 1

E. None of the above.

Step-by-step explanation:

None of the statements A-D provide a reason why manipulation of consumers is not relevant to marketing ethics. They all imply that manipulation is a potential ethical issue in marketing.

- Statement A suggests that marketers may use psychological profiles to manipulate consumer behavior, which is an ethical concern.

- Statement B implies that some marketing practices may exploit vulnerable populations, which also raises ethical issues.

- Statement C and D both argue that manipulation can occur without deception or total control, suggesting that even subtle forms of manipulation could be ethically problematic.

So, none of these statements suggest that manipulation is not relevant to marketing ethics.

Hope this helps! :)