175k views
2 votes
An award of damages for a breach of contract can elevate the non-breaching party to a better position than he or she would have been in if the contract had not been breached. a) True b) False c) Depends on the type of contract d) Only for written contracts

User Bubaker
by
7.2k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

a) True

An award of damages for a breach of contract can indeed elevate the non-breaching party to a better position than they would have been in if the contract had not been breached. The purpose of awarding damages in a breach of contract case is to compensate the non-breaching party for any losses they suffered as a result of the breach. The goal is to place the non-breaching party in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed as agreed. Therefore, depending on the specifics of the case and the damages awarded, the non-breaching party may end up in a better financial or legal position than they would have been if the breach had not occurred. This principle applies to contracts in general and is not limited to any specific type of contract or whether it is written or oral.

User Alexander Kosenkov
by
8.5k points