129k views
0 votes
The Supreme Court's ruling in District of Columbia v Heller dramatically changed the meaning of the Second Amendment by

confering to citizens an individual right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes.
O denying the collective right to bear arms for the purpose of protection.
establishing the right to bear arms as a collective right.
O emphasizing that the right to bear arms was conferred only on a well-regulated militia.

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The Supreme Court ruling in District of Columbia v Heller dramatically changed the meaning of the Second Amendment by conferring an individual right to possess firearms for lawful purposes.


Step-by-step explanation:

The Supreme Court's ruling in District of Columbia v Heller did dramatically change the meaning of the Second Amendment by confering to citizens an individual right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes. This ruling affirmed that the right to bear arms is not solely a collective right for the purpose of protection by a militia, but an individual right as well. This landmark case has had a significant impact on the interpretation of the Second Amendment.


Learn more about Second Amendment

User Sandie
by
8.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.