Final answer:
The 1920s jewelry advertisement could be considered more compelling due to its display of luxurious lifestyle through vivid colors and long necklaces, in alignment with the freedom and decorative style of Art Nouveau fashion, and the emphasis on sensory richness with the visual appearance of gold links and the implied scent of huile antique.
Step-by-step explanation:
The persuasiveness of a fashion advertisement can often be subjective, but if I had to choose between the two described, I might find the jewelry advertisement from the 1920s more compelling. Firstly, the vivid portrayal of the diverse and colorful garment accompanied by long necklaces indicates the luxurious lifestyle associated with the jewelry, emphasizing the status and elegance of the wearer. This aligns with the allure of the Art Nouveau period, which celebrated decorative elements and the freedom of women's fashion after the restrictive Victorian dress codes.
Secondly, the visual richness of the ad, with its gold links gleaming on the woman's neck and the scented oil in her hair, suggests not just opulence but also appeals to sensory experiences, which can be persuasive elements in advertising. While the 1950s ad featuring Dovima and Christian Dior's evening dress certainly carries its own cachet with classic prestige, the jewelry advertisement's evocation of status and sensory richness might resonate more strongly with some potential customers.