5.5k views
3 votes
Pavan company manufactures carpets. His company is situated in a small town and is having

a labour crisis. He is operating at 50% capacity level and manufactures 2,000 carpets per
year and each carpet on an average sell at Rs 10,000.
Direct material ₹ 5,000 per unit
Direct labour ₹ 2,000 per unit
Variable overhead ₹ 1,000 per unit
Manufacturing overhead (fixed) ₹ 20,00,000
Administrative overheads (fixed) ₹ 15,00,000
In case management shuts down the plant, fixed manufacturing overheads will reduce to ₹
10,00,000. Fixed administrative overheads will reduce by ₹ 10,00,000. Management has to
pay ₹ 10,00,000 to the laborer in case the plant shuts down. Management is certain that the
business will recover after a few months and the labours problem will be over.
Required
a. Advice the management whether the plant should shut down or continue to operate. State
reasons
b. What will be your decision in case the plant was operating at 80% instead of 50% level?
Show calculations.

User Ivan Zarea
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

2 votes

a. Based on the given information, it is advisable for the management to shut down the plant. Here are the reasons:

1. Current Capacity Level: The company is operating at only 50% capacity level, manufacturing 2,000 carpets per year. This indicates that there is excess production capacity that is not being utilized efficiently.

2. Labour Crisis: The company is facing a labour crisis, which is likely affecting productivity and the ability to meet customer demands. Operating under such conditions can lead to compromised quality and customer dissatisfaction.

3. Financial Impact: By shutting down the plant, the company can reduce fixed manufacturing overheads from ₹20,00,000 to ₹10,00,000 and fixed administrative overheads from ₹15,00,000 to ₹5,00,000. This will help reduce costs and preserve financial resources during the labor crisis.

4. Recovery Period: The management is certain that the labor problem will be resolved and business will recover after a few months. Therefore, it makes more financial sense to temporarily shut down the plant, minimize costs, and resume operations when the labor crisis is resolved.

b. In case the plant was operating at 80% capacity level instead of 50%, the decision might change. Let's calculate the costs:

Current capacity: 2,000 carpets per year

At 80% capacity level: 80% of 2,000 = 1,600 carpets per year

Total variable cost per carpet:

Direct material: ₹5,000

Direct labor: ₹2,000

Variable overhead: ₹1,000

Total variable cost per carpet = ₹5,000 + ₹2,000 + ₹1,000 = ₹8,000

Total fixed costs:

Manufacturing overhead (current): ₹20,00,000

Administrative overhead (current): ₹15,00,000

Total fixed costs (current) = ₹20,00,000 + ₹15,00,000 = ₹35,00,000

Total fixed costs (if plant shuts down) = ₹10,00,000 + ₹5,00,000 = ₹15,00,000

To decide whether to shut down or continue operating at 80% capacity, compare the costs:

Cost of operating at 80% capacity:

Fixed costs + (Variable cost per carpet x Number of carpets)

Cost of operating at 80% capacity = ₹35,00,000 + (₹8,000 x 1,600)

Cost of shutting down the plant = ₹15,00,000 + ₹10,00,000 (additional labor cost)

Compare the two costs and assess which option is more financially viable for the company.

User Pooja Joshi
by
7.7k points