Final answer:
This question explores the relation between assertion and reason in logical arguments. Different situations are discussed where both or either of these can be true or false and how it impacts the validity of the argument.
Step-by-step explanation:
This question deals with the concept of logical inference and the relation between reasons and assertions in the context of an argument. A brief explanation of the options would be A. if both assertion and reason are true but the reason is the correct explanation of assertion, this means the reason effectively supports the statement made in the assertion. B. If both assertion and reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of assertion, it indicates the reason doesn't directly support the assertion, though it may be true in some other context. C. If assertion is true but reason is false, it means the claim being made is correct, however, the reasoning or evidence provided to support the claim is incorrect. D. If both the assertion and reason are false, it means both the claim and the reasoning are incorrect. E. If reason is true but assertion is false, it means the explanation or reasoning is correct but is used to support a false claim.
Learn more about Logical Inference