Let's break down each of these concepts:
1. Power but not legitimacy?
* As you've correctly pointed out, it's entirely possible for someone to have power without legitimacy. A classic example is a dictator who takes control through force, threats, or bribery. The people might not agree with or support this ruler, making their power illegitimate in the eyes of many.
2. Authority but not power?
* Authority can be seen as the right to make decisions or to direct others. You can have authority because of your role or position, but not necessarily have the power to enforce your decisions. For example, a company manager might have the authority to set rules, but if they don't have the resources or support of their team, they might lack the power to enforce those rules effectively.
3. Power but no authority?
* This is when someone has the ability to enforce decisions or control others, but they don't have the formal or legitimate right to do so. A gang leader might have power over a neighborhood but doesn't have the formal authority to rule that neighborhood.
4. Sovereignty but not power?
* Sovereignty refers to the full right and power of a governing body to govern itself without any interference from outside sources or bodies. A country might have sovereignty in the sense that it's recognized as an independent nation, but if it's weak militarily or economically, it might not have the power to defend its interests or influence other nations.
5. Legitimacy but not authority?
* Legitimacy relates to being recognized as right and proper. A leader might be seen as legitimate because they were elected or because they follow traditional customs. However, they might lack the formal authority to make certain decisions. For example, a constitutional monarch might be a legitimate head of state but lacks the authority to make executive decisions without the approval of a parliament or other governing body.
I hope this helps!