129k views
3 votes
Would Kentucky have been allowed to have slavery? Why or why not?

Would Kentucky have been allowed to have slavery? Why or why not?-example-1
User Numlet
by
7.6k points

2 Answers

1 vote
yes because kentucky is a slave state due to the 36 30 parallel line
User Caleb Denio
by
7.3k points
4 votes

Answer:

Would Kentucky have been allowed to have slavery? Why or why not?

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, Kentucky was allowed to have slavery. At the time of Kentucky's admission to the Union in 1792, slavery was legal and permitted in the United States. The U.S. Constitution at the time also allowed for slavery and even included provisions for the return of escaped slaves to their owners.

Furthermore, Kentucky was a slave state and had a significant slave population. In fact, during the 1850s, Kentucky had the third-largest slave population of any state in the country, after Virginia and Georgia. The state's economy was heavily dependent on slave labor, particularly in the production of tobacco and hemp.

It wasn't until the Civil War, with the passage of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, that slavery was abolished throughout the country, including in Kentucky.

User Speldosa
by
7.2k points