Question

which of the following groups are worse off as a result of the union action in the western state? check all that apply. all workers in the western state workers who find new jobs in the eastern state employers in the western state the original workers in the eastern state

Answer 1

The employers in the western state are worse off as a result of the union action.

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the given information, the group that is worse off as a result of the union action in the western state would be the employers in the western state. This is because the union action usually leads to higher wages and better working conditions for the workers, which can increase costs for the employers. The other groups mentioned, such as all workers in the western state, workers who find new jobs in the eastern state, and the original workers in the eastern state may not necessarily be worse off as a result of the union action.

Answer 2

Employers in the Western state and the original workers there may be worse off due to the negative impact of union actions on job availability and hiring practices. Workers who move East may benefit from new opportunities, while Eastern workers might face increased competition.

Step-by-step explanation:

In assessing the impact of union actions in a Western state, we must consider various stakeholders. Employers in the Western state may be worse off, as unions pushing for higher wages could lead to less hiring or relocating of jobs. The original workers in the Western state, particularly those who are part of the union, might find themselves at a disadvantage due to potential job loss or decreased job opportunities. On the contrary, workers who migrate and find new jobs in the Eastern state, might be better off if they secure employment under more favorable conditions. Finally, the original non-union workers in the Eastern state could experience increased competition for jobs with incoming workers leading to a complex mix of outcomes.