Question

1. which of the following statements represents the primary concerns of people who are in favor of net neutrality? a. they fear that isps will be able to block content representing controversial points of view or that access to high speed internet transmission will be restricted to content providers who can pay for faster transmission. b. they are concerned that isps will become over-regulated by government agencies. c. they are concerned that isps will lose the ability to properly fund network expansion to accommodate the growing need for bandwidth intensive services.

Answer 1

The primary concerns of people in favor of net neutrality are that ISPs may block content and restrict access based on payment, and that network expansion may suffer. Net neutrality is an important topic in the national debate about internet access, with supporters arguing for an open and fair internet.

Step-by-step explanation:

The primary concerns of people who are in favor of net neutrality include:

1. They fear that ISPs will be able to block content representing controversial points of view or that access to high-speed internet transmission will be restricted to content providers who can pay for faster transmission.
2. They are concerned that ISPs will lose the ability to properly fund network expansion to accommodate the growing need for bandwidth-intensive services.

Net neutrality is an important topic in the national debate about Internet access and the digital divide. Supporters believe that treating all internet data equally is necessary to maintain an open and fair internet, while opponents argue that it could impose regulatory burdens on telecommunication companies.

Answer 2

The primary concerns of people in favor of net neutrality is:

• a. They fear that ISPs will be able to block content representing controversial points of view or that access to high-speed internet transmission will be restricted to content providers who can pay for faster transmission.

Net neutrality advocates are people who worry that without regulations, ISPs could potentially discriminate against certain types of content or favor those who can afford faster access, undermining the principle of equal access to the internet.

In a world without net neutrality, there is a risk that ISPs could wield too much power over what content is accessible and which potentially limit is the diversity of voices and ideas available online.

This concern is rooted in a desire to preserve a free and open internet where all information is treated equally, regardless of its source or nature. Therefore, the Option A is right.