Question

You will participate in a Discussion Board with your peers to express your ideas on the unit topics.

As of 2015, there were 9 United Nations peacekeeping missions in Africa consisting of about 95,000 military and civilian personnel from many countries. Those figures account for about 80 percent of all 2015 peacekeeping missions. The goals of the peacekeeping missions in Africa include bringing stability to areas where violence has occurred, keeping violence from beginning or from expanding, and assisting in peaceful political transitions. In a search engine, enter the words "UN peacekeeping missions Africa 2015" to locate more information about the peacekeeping missions. You may use UN sources, but be sure to use at least one non-UN source as well. Consider the pros and cons of these missions and then express your opinion on peacekeeping missions. Are they effective? Is there a better alternative in regions in conflict?

Respond to the prompt. Support your opinions with explanations and evidence.

pls do this

Answer 1

Peacekeeping missions have been a subject of debate for many years. As of 2015, the United Nations had nine peacekeeping missions in Africa, which accounted for about 80% of all peacekeeping missions. While the goals of these missions are noble and necessary, the effectiveness of these missions remains questionable.

One advantage of peacekeeping missions is that they can help bring stability to areas where violence has occurred. By deploying military and civilian personnel, the United Nations can help to restore order and prevent further violence. Additionally, peacekeeping missions can assist in peaceful political transitions and help to keep violence from beginning or expanding. These are all critical functions that can make a significant difference in conflict zones.

However, there are also some disadvantages to peacekeeping missions. One issue is that peacekeeping missions can be costly, both in terms of finances and human lives. Additionally, peacekeeping missions can be challenging to execute, particularly in areas where there are no clear boundaries or where multiple factions are involved.

In my opinion, peacekeeping missions can be effective, but they are not the best alternative in regions in conflict. Instead, a more proactive approach is needed. This approach involves working with local communities to address the root causes of conflict, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to resources. Additionally, a focus on conflict prevention and diplomacy can be more effective than peacekeeping missions, which are often reactive in nature.

In conclusion, peacekeeping missions are an essential tool in conflict resolution, but they are not a complete solution. To achieve lasting peace in conflict zones, we need to address the underlying issues that lead to violence and conflict. By working together, we can create a more peaceful and just world.