Final Answer:
Using a meter rule would likely decrease the accuracy of the student's measurement of the cube's width. The meter rule's limited resolution, typically in the range of millimeters, would make it challenging to obtain a precise measurement compared to the digital micrometer with a resolution of 0.01 mm.
Step-by-step explanation:
In measuring the width of the metal cube, the resolution of the measuring instrument plays a crucial role in determining the accuracy of the measurement. The resolution of a measuring tool refers to the smallest incremental change it can detect. In this case, the digital micrometer has a resolution of 0.01 mm, which means it can measure changes in width as small as 0.01 mm. On the other hand, a typical meter rule may have a resolution of 1 mm, making it less precise compared to the micrometer.
To illustrate, consider that the actual width of the metal cube is 18.45 mm. The micrometer, with its fine resolution, can provide a more accurate measurement, such as 18.46 mm or 18.44 mm. However, if a meter rule were used, the measurement might be rounded to the nearest millimeter, resulting in a less precise value, such as 18 mm or 19 mm. This potential rounding error demonstrates how the choice of measuring tool can impact the accuracy of the measurement.
In conclusion, the student's decision to use a digital micrometer instead of a meter rule was wise in achieving a more accurate measurement of the metal cube's width. The micrometer's superior resolution allows for finer precision, reducing the likelihood of measurement errors compared to the coarser resolution of a meter rule.