Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an example of how slavery led to the Civil War for several reasons:
It highlighted the growing divide between the North and South over the issue of slavery. The Missouri Compromise sought to balance the number of free and slave states in the Union, but it also showed how difficult it was to maintain that balance, especially as new territories were added to the United States.
The Missouri Compromise also demonstrated the inability of Congress to fully resolve the issue of slavery. While it temporarily resolved the issue of Missouri's admission to the Union as a slave state, it did not address the underlying tensions and conflicts between slave and free states. This created a precedent for future legislative attempts to address the issue of slavery that would ultimately fail, such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.
The Missouri Compromise contributed to the growth of abolitionism in the North. The controversy surrounding the Compromise and the spread of slavery into new territories heightened awareness and opposition to the institution of slavery, particularly among Northern abolitionists. This, in turn, fueled the sectional tensions that would ultimately lead to the Civil War.
In summary, the Missouri Compromise demonstrated the difficulty of resolving the issue of slavery, the growing divide between the North and South over this issue, and the growth of abolitionism in the North. These factors all contributed to the tensions that ultimately led to the Civil War.