65.7k views
3 votes
Which best describes the role of the US Supreme Court in the 2000 presidential election?

It declared George W. Bush the winner of the election.
It refused to become involved in the election.
It ordered a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.
It stopped a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.

User Henriale
by
7.7k points

2 Answers

4 votes

 answer: It stopped a recount in Florida, resulting in Bush’s election.

explain: The US Supreme Court stopped a recount in Florida, resulting in George W. Bush's election in the 2000 presidential election. In the case of Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's decision to allow a manual recount of votes was unconstitutional. This decision effectively ended the recount and allowed the certified results, which showed Bush as the winner, to stand.

User Ryan Glenn
by
7.5k points
5 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

he US Supreme Court played a critical role in the 2000 presidential election by ruling on legal challenges related to the vote count in the state of Florida. In the aftermath of the election, the results in Florida were too close to call, and both Republican candidate George W. Bush and Democratic candidate Al Gore claimed victory. The vote count and the legal challenges continued for weeks, with various courts weighing in on issues related to ballot design, recounts, and the inclusion of overseas absentee ballots.

Ultimately, the US Supreme Court heard a case brought by the Bush campaign, which challenged the recount process underway in Florida. The Court issued a controversial ruling in Bush v. Gore, effectively ending the recount and handing the presidency to George W. Bush. The Court's decision was based on a finding that the recount process in Florida violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.

The Supreme Court's role in the 2000 election was significant, and the decision was widely debated and criticized. Some observers argued that the Court overstepped its bounds by interfering in a state election, while others saw the decision as necessary to provide a final resolution to a contentious and protracted dispute.

User Ora
by
6.8k points