Question

• Martin Luther King uses logos (the message), ethos (his credibility), and pathos (the emotional connection to the reader) to convince a group of pastors that his cause should also be their cause. Discuss the 'ethos' King portrayed to the reader. How did he prove to them his voice was worth listening to?

• Does Sherry make a good argument? Why? How could Sherry improve her argument? Explain.

Note: To earn full credit for this graded discussion, post at least two times. First, post your own thoughts. This post should be substantial (containing at least 250-300 words). Next, respond to the post of another student. Remember to follow the rules of netiquette. Be polite, professional, and thoughtful. This post should contain at least 100-150 words. All posts need to be in your own words

Answer 1

Martin Luther King portrayed ethos by establishing his credibility and authority as a leader in the civil rights movement.

Step-by-step explanation:

Martin Luther King portrayed ethos in his speech to convince the group of pastors by establishing his credibility and authority as a leader in the civil rights movement. He proved to them that his voice was worth listening to by referencing his own background as a minister and his involvement in peaceful protests and demonstrations. King presented himself as a moral and ethical individual who had dedicated his life to fighting for justice and equality.

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Martin Luther King was a credible and authoritative figure in the civil rights movement, and he effectively used ethos to establish his credibility in the minds of his readers. He was a well-educated and respected leader who had been involved in numerous civil rights campaigns. In his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," he used his experience and knowledge of the movement to establish himself as a reliable source of information. He also drew on his moral authority as a clergyman to appeal to the moral conscience of his readers.

King's ethos is evident in the way he addressed the pastors in his letter. He used respectful language and acknowledged their status as leaders in their community. He also identified himself as a fellow clergyman and expressed his disappointment that they did not share his view on the issue of civil rights.

Moreover, King cited numerous examples of his nonviolent protests and campaigns, which proved his leadership skills and his commitment to nonviolence. He highlighted the role of the church in the civil rights movement and emphasized that the church had a moral obligation to support the cause.

In conclusion, King's ethos was established through his educational background, his leadership in the civil rights movement, and his position as a clergyman. He used his credibility and moral authority to persuade his readers to support the civil rights cause.

Regarding Sherry's argument, it is difficult to evaluate without more information about the specific argument being made. However, a good argument should be well-supported by evidence and logically structured. To improve an argument, it is important to address potential counterarguments and use persuasive language to engage the reader.