Final answer:
The configuration of continents affects the seasonal swings in global atmospheric CO2, with movements of continents potentially making these swings much smaller or even undetectable. The measurement methods involving light and dark bottles can assess NEP and GPP but not NPP because dark bottles only account for autotrophic respiration.
Step-by-step explanation:
Regarding the hypothetical scenario where all of Earth's land mass is clustered around the South Pole, the seasonal swings in average global CO2 would be much smaller, perhaps even undetectable. This configuration would drastically alter the current global carbon cycle, as a significant portion of the Earth's vegetation, which plays a crucial role in absorbing atmospheric CO2, is located in the Northern Hemisphere. Seasonal growth and respiration, which are largely driven by the biomass and activity in these vegetated areas, currently contribute to the observable seasonal fluctuations in CO2 levels, peaking in late April due to the onset of spring growth in the Northern Hemisphere.
In the case of net ecosystem production (NEP) and gross primary production (GPP), changes in CO2 levels can be measured in light and dark bottles. However, net primary production (NPP) cannot be estimated this way. This is because the dark bottles account for carbon dioxide changes due to autotrophic respiration only, occurring without the influence of light, and the light bottles take into consideration the impact of light on both autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms, including their respiration and photosynthesis processes, but do not distinguish between the two to offer a measure of actual net primary productivity.