Question

Can someone please summarize this and paraphrase?Pleaseeeee

In July 1832, Jackson vetoed a bill for the renewal of the Second Bank of the United States. Even though the Supreme Court upheld the right of the federal government to run a bank (McCulloch v. Maryland), Jackson still disagreed with this ruling and thought it was immoral. Jackson vetoed the bill, saying the Bank was unconstitutional and that it was neither "necessary" nor "proper" for the federal government to allow such a big, powerful institution to exist. Jackson signed the Tariff of 1832 later this same month, which reduced some of the tariffs from the Tariff of 1828, but it wasn’t enough to receive much more additional support from the South.

Answer 1

In July 1832, President Jackson rejected the renewal of the Second Bank of the United States, despite the Supreme Court's approval of the government's right to operate a bank.
Jackson believed that the Bank was unconstitutional and immoral, and that it was not necessary or appropriate for the federal government to permit such a large and powerful institution to exist. Jackson also approved the Tariff of 1832, which reduced some of the tariffs from the Tariff of 1828, but this did not gain much more support from the South.