Answer:
Werner Herzog's role as a director and editor of his own movies and Treadwell's films is an interesting aspect to discuss when analyzing the documentary Grizzly Man. Herzog intervenes in the film by providing his own commentary and editing Treadwell's footage to construct a narrative. He uses Treadwell's footage to craft a story about Treadwell and his mission to protect the bears. However, Herzog's view of nature is different from Treadwell's, as he sees nature as being indifferent and even hostile to human existence.
In the film, Herzog expresses his skepticism towards Treadwell's views on nature. He believes that Treadwell's romanticized view of nature is misguided and even dangerous. Treadwell sees himself as a protector of the bears, but Herzog argues that Treadwell was actually endangering their lives by habituating them to human presence. Herzog also highlights the risks involved in Treadwell's actions, such as the possibility of a bear attack.
Herzog's commentary also highlights the differences between his worldview and Treadwell's. While Treadwell sees nature as a benign and loving entity, Herzog views it as a force that is indifferent to human existence. This is reflected in his description of nature as a "red in tooth and claw" world, where the weak are eaten by the strong. Herzog believes that humans are not meant to be a part of this world and that Treadwell's death is a result of his misguided attempt to befriend the bears.
In summary, Herzog's role as a director and editor of Grizzly Man is to provide a counter-narrative to Treadwell's romanticized view of nature. He intervenes in the film with his own commentary and editing to craft a story about Treadwell and his relationship with the bears. The difference between Herzog's view of nature and Treadwell's is also highlighted in the film, with Herzog seeing nature as indifferent and hostile, while Treadwell sees it as loving and benign.
Step-by-step explanation: