Question

Two young people are discussing going to a party. They are fully aware that drugs and alcohol will be there, also. The two youngsters rationalize that the party will bring great happiness since it will be the first party allowed since the pandemic shutdown. Every youngster within a 40-mile radius is planning to be there. Youngster-A is starting to consider the consequences of the party and whether it will bring happiness, particularly days later. Youngster-B says that at least it will bring happiness when it happens. Youngster-A responds, yes, but what if parents find out days later? The student continues, what if underage minors are there, the police find out, and the whole thing gets reported back to the school? There could be some terrible results. Besides, Youngster-A says, think back to when you have gone to parties with drugs and alcohol; things never go well. Drugs and alcohol are always harmful at parties. What two (2) moral theories are identified as best for this situation

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

There are several moral theories that could be applicable to this situation, but two that stand out are consequentialism and deontology.

Consequentialism is a moral theory that focuses on the consequences of actions. According to consequentialism, an action is morally right if it leads to the best overall outcome or consequences. In this case, Youngster-A seems to be considering the potential consequences of going to the party, particularly in terms of how it could affect their lives days or weeks later. Youngster-B, on the other hand, seems to be more focused on the immediate pleasure and excitement of attending the party. From a consequentialist perspective, it would be important to consider all of the potential consequences of attending the party before making a decision.

Deontology is a moral theory that emphasizes the duty or obligation to follow certain moral rules or principles. According to deontology, some actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their consequences. In this case, there are several moral rules and principles that could be relevant, such as the duty to obey the law, the obligation to avoid harm to oneself or others, and the responsibility to act in a way that aligns with one's values and beliefs. From a deontological perspective, it would be important to consider how attending the party aligns with these moral rules and principles.

Both consequentialism and deontology offer different ways of approaching moral decision-making in this situation. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to attend the party will depend on the individual's values, beliefs, and priorities, as well as the specific circumstances of the party and potential consequences.