174k views
1 vote
Help please and thankyou it’s due soon

Help please and thankyou it’s due soon-example-1

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

w=20cm

Explanation:

Tough question.

We are not told whether the surface area is only what can be seem from the top, or does it include regions beneath the butterfly. I made the assumption it is from the top

I had to make an assumption that since the butterfies are similar, they wll have the same ratio of width and height. We will assume an "effective height," a value of height that when multiplied by the width will yield the correct surface area of 53 cm^2.

See the attached worksheet.

The effective height for the smaller butterfly is 13.25cm. This multiplied by the given width (4cm) produces the surface area of 53 cm^3. The ratio of width to height (w/h) is 0.302.

We've already made the assumption that the width to height of the larger butterfly will be the same. Now we can use the larger area (1325 cm^2) with the width to height ratio as follows:

Area = w*h

Since w/h is = 0.302, we can write w = 0.302h or h = (w/0.302)

1325 cm^2 = w*h

1325 cm^2 = w*(w/0.302)

w^2 = 200

w = 20 cm

(I made several assumptions in this analysis. Review them carefully).

Help please and thankyou it’s due soon-example-1
User ARH
by
7.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories