Question

PLEASE HELP ME PLEASEEEEEEE

The following passage is excerpted from Life of Pi by Yann Martel. Read the passage carefully. Write an essay that analyzes the literary choices Martel makes to convey his message. In your response you should do the following:
Respond to the prompt with a thesis that analyzes the writer’s literary choices.
Select and use evidence to support your line of reasoning.
Explain how the evidence supports your line of reasoning.
Demonstrate an understanding of the literary situation.
Use appropriate grammar and punctuation in communicating your analysis.

Mr. Okamoto: "But for the purposes of our investigation, we would like to know what really happened.
[Pi:] "What really happened?"
[Mr. Okamoto:] "Yes."
[Pi:] "So you want another story?"
[Mr. Okamoto:] "Uhh...no. We would like to know what really happened."
[Pi:] "Doesn't the telling of something always become a story?"
[Mr. Okamoto:] "Uhh...perhaps in English. In Japanese a story would have an element of invention in it. We don't want any invention. We want the 'straight facts,' as you say in English."
[Pi:] "Isn't telling about something – using words, English or Japanese – already an invention? Isn't just looking upon this world already something of an invention?
[Mr. Okamoto:] "Uhh..."
[Pi:] "The world isn't just the way it is. It is how we understand it, no? And in understanding something, we bring something to it, no? Doesn't that make life a story?"
[Pi:] "So tell me, since it makes no factual difference to you and you can't prove the question either way, which story do you prefer? Which is the better story, the story with animals or the story without animals?"
Mr. Okamoto: "That's an interesting question..."
Mr. Chiba: "The story with animals."
Mr. Okamoto: "Yes. The story with the animals is the better story."
Pi Patel: "Thank you. And so it goes with God."

Answer 1

In Life of Pi, Yann Martel uses the conversation between Pi and the Japanese investigators to convey the idea that life is a story shaped by the way we understand and tell it. Martel employs literary choices such as dialogue, characterization, and symbolism to develop this message throughout the passage.

The dialogue between Pi and the investigators is central to Martel's message. Through their conversation, Martel argues that there is no such thing as an objective truth. When Mr. Okamoto asks for "what really happened," Pi challenges this notion by questioning whether telling something with words already involves an element of invention. Pi's response challenges the idea of objective truth and suggests that there are multiple ways to understand and interpret the same events. This is further emphasized when Pi asks the investigators which story they prefer, the one with animals or without. Martel uses this exchange to illustrate that storytelling is a subjective process and that we bring our own experiences and perspectives to it.

Moreover, Martel uses characterization to develop his message. Pi's character serves as an embodiment of the idea that life is a story. He is a storyteller himself, having told the story of his survival at sea to the investigators. He also has a deep spiritual and philosophical understanding of the world, which is evident in his responses to the investigators. In contrast, Mr. Okamoto and Mr. Chiba are characterized as more rigid and pragmatic in their thinking. They are interested in the "straight facts," which Pi challenges throughout the conversation.

Finally, Martel uses symbolism to reinforce his message. The animals in Pi's story represent different aspects of his own personality and experiences. The tiger, Richard Parker, represents Pi's survival instinct and animal nature, while the other animals represent his faith, hope, and innocence. By incorporating these symbols into the story, Martel emphasizes that our own experiences and perceptions shape the stories we tell about ourselves and the world around us.

In conclusion, Yann Martel uses literary choices such as dialogue, characterization, and symbolism to convey the idea that life is a story shaped by the way we understand and tell it. Through Pi's conversation with the Japanese investigators, Martel challenges the idea of objective truth and argues that storytelling is a subjective process. Pi's character serves as an embodiment of this idea, while the animals in his story represent different aspects of his own experiences and personality. By incorporating these literary choices into the passage, Martel develops a powerful message about the nature of storytelling and its relationship to our understanding of the world.

Step-by-step explanation: