Question

Amber knew her speech on death camps in Africa was bad. It was quickly prepared, inadequately researched, and not very logical. However, she felt she could pull it off because she planned on ending her speech with a video showing mass graves that she knew would make people sick. Her reasoning was, "It doesn't matter if your speech sucks as long as you get them in the end!" How do you think the audience will most likely react? 1. A standing ovation 2. Wholehearted support for her point-of-view 3. Appreciation of her fine work, once the nausea subsides 4. Mixed reviews; some appreciating the video, while others finding it distasteful 5. Resentment towards Amber and her point-of-view for using such an obvious ploy choose one and explain your reason​

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

It is most likely that the audience will react with option 5 - resentment towards Amber and her point-of-view for using such an obvious ploy.

While the video may initially shock and disgust the audience, they will likely quickly realize that Amber's speech was poorly prepared and lacked logical arguments. Rather than being moved by her message, the audience is more likely to feel manipulated and insulted by her tactics.

Using such shock tactics without a clear message or well-researched arguments is unlikely to win over an audience, and instead, it is likely to lead to distrust and resentment towards the speaker. The audience is likely to feel that Amber has disrespected their time and intelligence by presenting such a poorly prepared speech and relying solely on shock value to make her point.

In summary, the audience is most likely to react with resentment towards Amber and her point-of-view for using such an obvious ploy, as her poor preparation and lack of logical arguments will make her reliance on shock tactics feel manipulative and insulting to the audience.