Answer:
In criminal justice, closed-system and open-system models represent two different approaches to understanding how criminal justice systems operate. The primary differences between these two models are:
Scope: Closed-system models view the criminal justice system as a self-contained entity that operates independently of external factors. Open-system models, on the other hand, recognize that the criminal justice system is influenced by social, economic, and political factors beyond its control.
Flexibility: Closed-system models are rigid and inflexible, with fixed procedures and protocols that are adhered to regardless of context. Open-system models are more adaptable, with the ability to adjust procedures and protocols in response to changing circumstances.
Efficiency: Closed-system models prioritize efficiency and uniformity in the administration of justice, often at the expense of fairness and individual rights. Open-system models prioritize fairness and individual rights, even if it means sacrificing some efficiency.
Feedback: Closed-system models are self-contained and do not seek feedback from external sources. Open-system models seek feedback from external sources to improve performance and ensure accountability.
Overall, closed-system models tend to be more authoritarian, while open-system models are more democratic and participatory. However, both models have their strengths and weaknesses, and many criminal justice systems combine elements of both.
Step-by-step explanation: