Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Sports and politics have been intertwined for centuries. From ancient Greece to modern-day Olympics, sports have always played a role in political discourse. However, to what extent should sports be political in today's world? This is a question that has sparked a lot of debate in recent times, especially with the rise of social media and the increased visibility of athletes.
In some cases, athletes have a duty to make their voices heard on political matters. One such example is when the issue in question directly affects the athletes' community or goes against their values. For instance, during the 1968 Olympics, Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists in a Black Power salute during the medal ceremony to protest racial discrimination in the United States. Their actions sparked controversy, but it also shed light on the issue and sparked a conversation that led to positive change.
On the other hand, society should not have the expectation that every athlete must make their voices heard on political matters. Athletes are not politicians; they are not trained to handle complex political issues, and they may not have the time or resources to stay informed on every political issue. Moreover, some athletes may not be comfortable sharing their political views in public, and it is unfair to pressure them to do so.
In conclusion, the question of whether sports should be political is a complex one. While athletes should use their platform to bring attention to issues that affect them and their community, society should not expect them to speak out on every political issue. Ultimately, it is up to the individual athlete to decide how they want to use their platform and whether they want to use it to amplify their voice on political matters.