Answer:
The maxim that has been flouted in the conversation is the Maxim of Relevance. The speech therapist asked about the child's favorite flavors of ice cream, but the child's response does not provide relevant information. Instead, the child mentions his/her favorite flavors of food that are not related to ice cream.
a. The maxim that the speaker is opting out of is the Maxim of Relevance. By saying "I'm sure you already know this," the speaker is suggesting that what they are about to say is not new or important information, which violates the principle of relevance.
b. The maxim that the speaker is opting out of is the Maxim of Clarity. By saying "This is a bit confused," the speaker is admitting that their message may not be clear or easy to understand, violating the principle of clarity.
c. The maxim that the speaker is opting out of is the Maxim of Quality. By saying "People say," the speaker is not providing a reliable source or factual information, violating the principle of quality.
d. The maxim that the speaker is opting out of is the Maxim of Brevity. By saying "To cut a long story short," the speaker is admitting that their story is too long or detailed, violating the principle of brevity.
e. The maxim that the speaker is opting out of is the Maxim of Relevance. By saying "This is irrelevant," the speaker is acknowledging that their message is not related or connected to the previous conversation or topic, violating the principle of relevance.
Step-by-step explanation: