67.5k views
0 votes
What arguments does Walzer examine about how terrorism can be handled? What does he say is the best course of action?

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

Michael Walzer is a political philosopher who has written about the ethics of warfare and terrorism. In his book "Just and Unjust Wars," he examines various arguments about how terrorism can be handled.

One argument he examines is the idea that terrorism is a form of warfare and should be treated as such. This view suggests that terrorism can be countered by military force and that countries have the right to defend themselves against terrorist attacks. However, Walzer argues that this approach can be problematic because it can lead to an escalation of violence and may not effectively address the underlying causes of terrorism.

Another argument he examines is the idea that terrorism is a criminal act and should be treated as such. This view suggests that terrorism can be countered by law enforcement and intelligence agencies, and that countries should work together to apprehend terrorists and disrupt their networks. Walzer acknowledges the importance of this approach, but argues that it may not be sufficient to address the political grievances and social conditions that can contribute to terrorism.

Ultimately, Walzer suggests that the best course of action for handling terrorism involves a combination of military force, law enforcement, and diplomacy. He argues that countries should work to disrupt terrorist networks, but also address the underlying causes of terrorism, such as poverty, political oppression, and religious extremism. In addition, he emphasizes the importance of respecting human rights and the rule of law in the fight against terrorism.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Arun George
by
6.8k points