Answer: 69.02
========================================================
Work Shown:
The notation f(-1) = 30 tells us that (x,y) = (-1,30) is a point on the exponential curve.
Plug in x = -1 and y = 30 and solve for 'a'
y = a*b^x
30 = a*b^(-1)
30 = a*(1/b^1)
30 = a/b
a = 30b
--------------------------------------------------
Now plug that into the equation to get
y = a*b^x
y = 30b*b^x
y = 30b^1*b^x
y = 30b^(1+x)
Afterward, plug in x = 4 and y = 85 to solve for b.
85 = 30b^(1+4)
85 = 30b^5
b^5 = 85/30
b = (85/30)^(1/5)
b = 1.23157122757057
We can then determine the value of 'a'
a = 30b
a = 30*1.23157122757057
a = 36.947136827117
--------------------------------------------------
To summarize,
- a = 36.947136827117
- b = 1.23157122757057
both of which are approximate.
Since we want f(3) to the nearest hundredth, we don't really need to go too overboard with precision. Let's round 'a' and b to 4 decimal places.
We then get
This means
y = a*b^x
turns into
y = 36.9471*(1.2316)^x
As a check, plug in x = -1 to get y = 29.999269; we'll have rounding error since we rounded those 'a' and b values earlier. But when rounding 29.999269 to the nearest hundredth, we get y = 30.
Also, plug x = 4 into the equation to get y = 85.00785875 which rounds to 85.
--------------------------------------------------
The last step is to plug x = 3 into the equation
y = 36.9471*(1.2316)^x
y = 36.9471*(1.2316)^3
y = 69.0222951885528
y = 69.02 which is the final answer
--------------------------------------------------
If you were to use those more accurate values of 'a' and b, then x = 3 would lead to y = 69.0175266335801; that rounds to 69.02 when rounding to the nearest hundredth (aka 2 decimal places). So this shows we can stick with the less accurate 'a' and b values while still getting the correct final answer.
GeoGebra and Desmos are great tools to help quickly verify the answer.