Final answer:
The main difference between the lifecycle of an average-sized star and a high-mass star is their lifespan and end fate; high-mass stars have short lifespans and end as supernovae, forming neutron stars or black holes, while average-sized stars become red giants and evolve into white dwarfs.
Step-by-step explanation:
One major difference between the lifecycle of an average-sized star, like our Sun, and a high-mass star is the lifespan and the ultimate fate of the star. Massive stars have shorter lifetimes than their lower-mass counterparts because they burn through their hydrogen fuel much more quickly. High-mass stars exhibit high temperatures and high luminosities, which means they are very bright and hot. As a result, they consume their fuel at an accelerated rate and evolve rapidly. After exhausting their hydrogen, high-mass stars undergo a series of nuclear reactions leading to the formation of heavier elements, ultimately exploding as supernovae and possibly forming neutron stars or black holes.
In contrast, average-sized stars like the Sun will swell into red giants once their hydrogen fuel is depleted; their lower mass does not allow the core temperature to rise high enough for more complex nuclear reactions that create heavier elements beyond helium. They will eventually shed their outer layers, creating a planetary nebula, and the core will remain as a white dwarf, slowly cooling over time.
Furthermore, the stellar mass determines the star's position on the main sequence and the rate at which hydrogen is converted into helium in its core, influencing its luminosity and temperature. Stars can lose a significant amount of mass over their lifetimes, which can affect their evolution and eventual demise. Understanding the life cycle of stars is crucial in astrophysics to predict a star's behavior and its effect on surrounding space.