89.4k views
4 votes
develop an argument that takes a position on whether the collection of the data was constitutional or that it was unconstitutional

User Skyman
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

The debate on whether the collection of data by the government is constitutional or not has been ongoing for some time. Those who argue that the collection of data is constitutional point out that it is a necessary tool to ensure national security and protect citizens from potential dangers. On the other hand, those who argue that the collection of data is unconstitutional point out that it violates citizens' right to privacy and can be used for nefarious purposes by the government. Ultimately, it is clear that the collection of data by the government can be a useful tool for law enforcement and national security, but it must be done in a way that protects citizens' right to privacy and limits the potential for abuse by the government. As such, the collection of data must be done in a manner that is proportional to the need and must be subject to oversight and accountability to ensure that it is not abused

Step-by-step explanation:

User Yury Glushkov
by
7.9k points