Answer:
Explanation:
Part A:
Option 1 shows an exponential growth pattern, as the value of the investment is increasing at an increasing rate each year. Option 2, on the other hand, shows a linear growth pattern, as the value of the investment is increasing at a constant rate each year.
Part B:
Option 1 can be described by the exponential function:
f(n) = 1000 x (1.3)^n
where n is the number of years, and 1.3 is the growth factor (calculated as 1300/1000).
Option 2 can be described by the linear function:
f(n) = 1000 + 300n
where n is the number of years, and 300 is the constant rate of increase in dollars per year.
Part C:
To determine which option will increase Belinda's investment value by the greatest amount in 20 years, we can calculate the value of each option after 20 years using the respective functions:
For Option 1:
f(20) = 1000 x (1.3)^20
f(20) = 1000 x 6.1917
f(20) = 6,191.70
For Option 2:
f(20) = 1000 + 300(20)
f(20) = 1000 + 6000
f(20) = 7,000
So, the investment value for Option 2 after 20 years is higher than that of Option 1. The difference in value is significant, as Option 2 would give Belinda an investment value of $7,000, while Option 1 would give her an investment value of $6,191.70. Therefore, if Belinda wants to increase her investment value by the greatest amount in 20 years, she should choose Option 2.