Final answer:
An argumentative essay supporting the stance that college athletes should not be paid may focus on the potential negative impacts on academic commitment, financial strains on colleges, and the preservation of educational integrity and equity among students.
Step-by-step explanation:
When crafting an argumentative essay on why college athletes should not be paid to play collegiate sports, it's essential to consider various perspectives. On one hand, paying student athletes could potentially diminish their academic commitment and prioritize sports over education. Moreover, colleges could face financial strain by compensating athletes, possibly reducing funds available for academic resources and scholarships for non-athletes. Furthermore, paying athletes can perpetuate the perception that collegiate sports overshadow the academic mission of institutions.
Evidence suggests that, contrary to popular belief, college athletes often perform well academically. For instance, studies show that they drop fewer classes, maintain higher grades, and are more likely to graduate on time compared to their non-athlete peers. This underlines that the current structure may adequately support their educational success. Additionally, a national survey indicated that a significant portion of Americans believe big-time college sports programs can corrupt higher education, hinting that monetizing college sports further could exacerbate this issue.
Arguments supported by evidence should be presented in a coherent and ordered manner, and it is crucial not to mesh unrelated points within the same argumentative section. Introducing monetary incentives into college sports could shift focus away from education, negating the core purpose of colleges and universities. Therefore, the thesis may be centered around the idea that maintaining amateurism in college sports preserves the integrity of educational values and provides equity among students.