162k views
0 votes
Someone, please help! Please see the two screenshots. One screenshot is about the question. The other screenshot is what I've written so far. My teacher told my class that we don't need to write a paragraph or create a poster. Please don't write the same answer that I've already written and please don't write random stuff! :)

Someone, please help! Please see the two screenshots. One screenshot is about the-example-1
Someone, please help! Please see the two screenshots. One screenshot is about the-example-1
Someone, please help! Please see the two screenshots. One screenshot is about the-example-2
User Shergill
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer: People living in volcanoes have a good fertile soil to plant and harvest crops so agriculture is very efficient.

Step-by-step explanation:

User John Pittaway
by
7.7k points
2 votes

Answer:

Pros of forcing people to move away from volcanoes and earthquake-prone areas:

Increased safety: Moving people away from hazardous areas reduces the risk of loss of life and property damage.

Reduced risk of injury: People who live in areas prone to natural disasters may be at risk of injury from falling debris or other hazards during an event.

Increased public awareness: Forcing people to move away from dangerous areas can increase public awareness of the risks associated with natural disasters.

Improved emergency response: With fewer people in harm's way, emergency responders can focus their efforts on helping those who are most in need.

Reduced need for rescue efforts: Fewer people in hazardous areas means that fewer rescue efforts will be needed in the event of a natural disaster.

Cons of forcing people to move away from volcanoes and earthquake-prone areas:

Disruption of communities: Moving people away from their homes can be highly disruptive to communities, especially those that have deep cultural and social ties to the area.

Loss of property: People who are forced to move may lose their homes and other property, which can be devastating both financially and emotionally.

Financial costs: Governments and other entities that are responsible for relocation efforts may incur significant costs associated with relocation, such as compensation for lost property or providing new housing for affected individuals and families.

Potential for conflict: Relocation efforts may lead to conflict between affected communities and government authorities, especially if relocation is perceived as being unfair or unjust.

Environmental impacts: Relocation efforts may lead to the destruction of natural habitats and other ecosystems, which can have long-term environmental consequences.

Decreased economic opportunities: People who are forced to move may lose their livelihoods and may have difficulty finding new employment opportunities in their new location.

Psychological impacts: Forced relocation can have significant psychological impacts on individuals and families, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Cultural loss: Communities that are forced to move may lose their cultural heritage, traditions, and way of life, which can be devastating both to the community and to the larger society.

Difficulty in finding suitable new housing: Finding suitable new housing for people who are forced to move can be a significant challenge, especially in areas where housing is already in short supply.

User Rzlines
by
7.3k points