Question

A 2015 New York Times article described Amazon as “a soulless, dystopian workplace where no fun is had and no laughter heard” (Cook 2015 n.p.). Employees themselves came to the company’s defense (Ciubotariu 2015). Does this reputation continue to haunt Amazon, or has it been addressed?

Answer 1

Solution:
Amazon was accused to be an organization that is boring and work-intensive with hardly any fun.
This directly meant that the work culture of
Amazon is not favorable for the employees and is negatively associated with the work culture that is considered to be positive for the employees.
This had resulted in strong counter-arguments from the Amazon emplovees themselves and there were discussions and debates around the working culture of Amazon.
Amazon has since then been open about their work culture and the ways in which they foster the growth of the company using their superior working culture. Amazon has come up with one of the best possible working cultures in the world and their work practices are in fact the ones that are employee-centric to ensure that their employees work with their utmost productivities.
Hence, the reputation of Amazon being a bad place to work has been diminished significantly, and in fact, Amazon today happens to be one of the best places to work, thus. Showcasing the quality of work culture present with the company and its employees. Hence, Amazon has developed a wok culture supporting their employees.