Question

which document, a true relation or a general history, do you think provides a more believable version of whether or not pocahontas saved john smith life? why?

Answer 1

Both a True Relation and a General History provide different perspectives on Pocahontas saving John Smith's life, but A True Relation is generally considered more believable as it is a firsthand account by John Smith himself.

Step-by-step explanation:

Both a True Relation and a General History provide different perspectives on whether or not Pocahontas saved John Smith's life. A True Relation is a firsthand account written by John Smith himself, while A General History is a later account written by Captain John Smith based on his experiences and the accounts of others. When it comes to comparing A True Relation written by John Smith and the story of Pocahontas, A True Relation is generally considered to be the more reliable source of information.

This is because the story is based on John Smith's firsthand account, meaning the narrative was derived directly from his personal experiences and knowledge Therefore, A True Relation is generally considered to be more believable as it is a direct and immediate account of the events.