Question

In addition to the general directions outlined in the syllabus, I would like for you to consider your ethical stance regarding the Ford Pinto case in terms of at least one of the ethical theories we have considered so far. Which one describes your stance as closely as possible? Why? Also, does this stance resonate with the readings on corporate and social responsibility? How? Again, the link to this is posted above. Remember to briefly explain how the theory you have chosen works. For example, if you choose Kant, explain the categorical imperative or if you choose utilitarianism, then explain the principle of utility.

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

One ethical theory that can be applied to the Ford Pinto case is utilitarianism, which is the idea that an action is morally right if it maximizes overall happiness or pleasure and minimizes overall pain or suffering. In this case, the utilitarian approach would suggest that the decision to release the Pinto despite knowing its faulty gas tank design was unethical because it resulted in unnecessary harm and death to its consumers. The company put profits above the safety of its consumers, which ultimately did not maximize overall happiness or pleasure.

This stance on utilitarianism does resonate with readings on corporate and social responsibility. The company had a responsibility to prioritize the safety of its consumers over profits, which was a clear failure of corporate social responsibility. By applying utilitarianism, it becomes clear that the company did not act in a way that maximized overall happiness or minimized overall pain.

It is important to note that there are other ethical theories that can be applied to the Ford Pinto case, such as deontology (which focuses on duty and moral obligation) or virtue ethics (which focuses on character and moral virtues). Each theory provides a different perspective on the ethical issues presented in the case.