145k views
2 votes
Please find something interesting and 2-3 questions i could ask regarding this topic

For this discussion post, I read the article written by Tom Bartlett, "Should all Genetics Research on Intelligence Be off Limits?" He talks about how human Intelligence research is a source of intense argument, with articles that spark protests and researchers that provoke public condemnation.
He then talks about how The University of Minnesota-Twin Cities behavioral geneticist James Lee estimated that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) limited access to the Genotypes and Phenotypes Database because the studies could be "stigmatizing."
However, Lee is not the only one expressing this frustration. According to the article, Stuart Ritchie, a King's College London professor and the author of Intelligence: All That Matters, found that the data is not being used to "investigate the genetics of intelligence."
The NIH claimed that all such investigations are banned, but around 75% of applications are given the go-ahead.
In the year 2020, intelligence journal editor Richard Haier recognized the criticism of the journal for releasing papers that had been cited as racist. He said that editors were neither naïve nor oblivious to their social responsibilities.
As proof of this backlash, he points to an August editorial published in Nature Human Behaviour modifying or rejecting editorial content that harmed the rights of an individual or human group.
The NIH's present stance on database access is difficult to analyze. However, the perception might be that something needs to be updated in the works should genetic research on intelligence be supported.
Racist people have been using intelligence research to justify hateful opinions and violent actions. According to Eric Turkheimer, a University of Virginia psychology professor, prohibiting genetic research dealing with intelligence is the wrong approach.
Psychologist and geneticist Robert Plomin says the NIH situation is bizarre and that he doesn't understand what they mean by stigmatizing genetics. He tries to explain the value of genetics to people who consider it irrelevant or threatening.

User James Simm
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

Interesting Topic: Should genetic research on intelligence be off-limits?

Questions:

What are the potential benefits and drawbacks of genetic research on intelligence?

How can genetic research on intelligence be conducted ethically and responsibly?

What are the potential consequences of limiting access to genetic research on intelligence?

User Poss
by
7.8k points