Question

Three reasons why protestors in advocacy campaign should avoid using violence during protest

Answer 1

Protesters in an advocacy campaign should avoid using violence during protests for several reasons:

1. Legitimacy: Protests that are violent may be viewed as illegitimate, and may turn public opinion against the cause that the protesters are advocating for. Nonviolent protests, on the other hand, can help to build support and credibility for the cause, as they demonstrate a commitment to peaceful dialogue and compromise.

2. Safety: Violence during protests can put both protesters and law enforcement officials at risk of injury or even death. Nonviolent protests, on the other hand, can help to create a safer environment for all involved, and can lead to more constructive and productive dialogues.

3. Legal consequences: Violent protests can result in legal consequences for the protesters, including arrest and imprisonment. Nonviolent protests, on the other hand, are more likely to be protected under the right to free speech and assembly, and may be less likely to result in legal repercussions.

In general, protests that are peaceful and nonviolent are more likely to be successful in achieving their goals, as they help to build support and credibility for the cause and create a safer and more constructive environment for all involved. Violence during protests, on the other hand, can have the opposite effect, turning public opinion against the cause and leading to dangerous and counterproductive confrontations.

Answer 2

Violence undermines the message: When protestors use violence during a protest, it can distract from the message they are trying to convey.

Violence can escalate the situation: When protestors use violence, it can often escalate the situation and lead to further violence.

Violence can damage the cause: When protestors use violence, it can give the impression that the cause they are advocating for is illegitimate or unworthy of support.