Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Jean Bethke Elshtain and Michael Walzer are two prominent scholars who have written extensively about just war theory and its application to terrorism. Brimlow argues that their framing of just war theory as applied to terrorism may actually serve to justify acts of terror such as those committed by Al Qaeda.
Brimlow suggests that Elshtain and Walzer's emphasis on the need for a "proportionate response" to terrorism may actually provide a rationale for terrorist attacks. According to Brimlow, this emphasis on proportionality may be interpreted by some as a call for terrorists to use violence in a way that is proportionate to the perceived injustice or oppression they are fighting against.
Additionally, Brimlow argues that Elshtain and Walzer's focus on the importance of protecting innocent civilians in war may be misinterpreted by some as a justification for deliberately targeting civilians. Terrorists may argue that their attacks are intended to force the government or military to stop targeting innocent civilians, and therefore they are acting in defense of those civilians.
Overall, Brimlow suggests that while Elshtain and Walzer's intention may be to limit the use of violence and promote a just response to terrorism, their framing of just war theory as applied to terrorism may inadvertently provide a moral justification for terrorist acts.