Step-by-step explanation:
No, it is not possible to give a literal reading of a text, untouched by interpretation. All readings of a text involve some level of interpretation, as language is inherently complex and often ambiguous. The act of reading involves making choices about which meanings to assign to words and phrases, and these choices are influenced by factors such as the reader's cultural background, personal experiences, and worldview.
For example, in legal contexts, judges are often tasked with interpreting the meaning of laws and applying them to specific cases. While some may argue that judges should simply apply the text of the law as it is written, this is not always possible, as laws may be vague or open to multiple interpretations. Judges must therefore use their own judgment and interpretation to determine the intent and scope of the law, and apply it in a manner that is consistent with legal precedent and their own sense of justice.
Similarly, in the context of religious fundamentalism, adherents may argue that their interpretation of religious texts is the only correct one, and that any other interpretation is a distortion or corruption of the true meaning. However, even within a single religious tradition, there may be multiple valid interpretations of sacred texts, and the act of interpretation itself is often shaped by cultural and historical factors.
Overall, while it is important to strive for accuracy and clarity in our interpretation of texts, it is impossible to completely divorce interpretation from the act of reading, and all readings involve some level of subjective judgment and interpretation.