Answer:
Case for Chihuly's work being considered Craft Art:
One argument for considering Chihuly's work as Craft Art is that it is created through a highly skilled, labor-intensive process. His blown glass sculptures require a great deal of technical proficiency and handcrafting, which is a defining characteristic of traditional craft practices. Additionally, his focus on decorative form and function, as seen in his chandeliers and vessels, reflects the traditional emphasis of craft art on functionality and utility. By this definition, Chihuly's work can be seen as a continuation of the craft tradition, with a contemporary twist.
Case against Chihuly's work being considered Craft Art:
On the other hand, some argue that Chihuly's work is not craft art because it does not prioritize function or utility. His sculptures are often created for purely aesthetic purposes and do not serve a functional purpose beyond their display. Additionally, the scale and ambition of his work go beyond the traditional parameters of craft art, which often emphasizes smaller-scale, utilitarian objects. Therefore, it can be argued that Chihuly's work is better classified as Fine Art.
Case for Chihuly's work being considered Fine Art:
One argument for considering Chihuly's work as Fine Art is that it is created with a focus on artistic expression rather than practicality. His pieces often explore themes such as color, texture, and form, and are intended to be displayed as standalone artworks. Additionally, Chihuly's work often challenges traditional notions of sculpture and installation, incorporating elements of light, space, and environment into his pieces. By these criteria, his work can be seen as Fine Art.
Case against Chihuly's work being considered Fine Art:
However, some argue that Chihuly's work is not Fine Art because it does not prioritize conceptual or intellectual content. His work is often criticized for being decorative or even ostentatious, lacking the intellectual depth or political and social commentary that is often associated with Fine Art. Some see his work as pandering to the commercial art market rather than making a meaningful artistic statement.
Third view:
Lastly, some argue that Chihuly's work should not be restricted to either Craft Art or Fine Art categories. Instead, they view his work as an exploration of the boundaries between the two, bridging the gap between traditional craft practices and contemporary Fine Art. By this view, Chihuly's work is neither purely utilitarian nor purely conceptual, but instead occupies a unique space in the art world that challenges the conventional distinctions between different types of art.